Notes on the current edition
Lives of Eminent Philosophers
1.
Diels (
Dox. Gr. p. 137) compares Hippolytus,
Ref. Haer. i. 8. 1-11; Aëtius, i. 3. 5; iv. 1. 3; ii. 20. 6; ii. 21. 3; ii. 28. 5; ii. 29. 7; ii. 23. 2; ii. 25. 9; iii. 1. 5; iii. 2. 2; iii. 2. 9; iii. 3. 4; iii. 15. 14; v. 7. 4, and Theophrastus,
Phys. Opin. Fr. 4. For Anaxagoras as astronomer see Sir T. L. Heath,
Aristarchus of Samos, pp. 78-85.
2.
Fr. 24 d.
3.
500-497 b.c.
4.
428 b.c.
5.
i.e. 456 b.c.; but possibly the year 480 is meant, when Calliades was archon.
6.
This version agrees with Pliny,
Nat. Hist. ii. 149
celebrant Graeci Anaxagoram Clazomenium Olympiadis septuagesimae octavae secundo anno praedixisse caelestium litterarum scientia quibus diebus saxum casurum esset e sole.
7.
Nauck,
T.G.F.
2,
Eur. 783.
8.
Anaxagoras, whose death falls in the fifth century,
circa 428-425 b.c., could not possibly have seen the famous Mausoleum erected by Artemisia, the widow of Mausolus, not earlier than 350 b.c. Mausolus ruled over Caria, according to Diodorus, from 377 to 353. The apophthegm is therefore either wrongly attributed to Anaxagoras or, if genuine, must have been uttered on some other occasion.
9.
From Plutarch’s Life of Nicias, c. 23, and Clement of Alexandria (
Strom. i. 78, p. 364 P.),
διὰ γραφῆς (for which Diels conjectures
‹μετὰ› διαγραφῆς)
ἐκδοῦναι βιβλίον ἱστοροῦσιν, the inference seems to be that Anaxagoras was credited with diagrams as well as text,
διδασκαλία καὶ γραφή. Laertius, if the text is sound, is much too vague; and some translate
was the first to bring out a book written by himself.
10.
Silenus of Calatia, who served in the Hannibalic war, wrote a History quoted by Cicero, Livy and Pliny; also a work on Sicily,
F.H.G. iii. 100.
11.
We know no archon Demylus. Various dates are suggested by critics; the years of (1) Demotion, archon 470, (2) Lysistratus, 467, (3) Diphilus, 442 b.c. The letters
-μυλου may not be part of the archon’s name but a distinct word, calling the meteor a
millstone,
i.e. in size.
12.
This version of the story agrees with that of Plutarch in his Life of Lysander, § 12
λέγεται δὲ. . .
τοῦ παντός.
13.
In ix. 34, 35 the statement that Democritus was hostile to Anaxagoras and criticized his doctrines is ascribed to Favorinus, and, as the motive alleged is similar, Favorinus may also be the source of the statement of ii. 14.
14.
Anth. Pal. vii. 94.
15.
Anth. Pal. vii. 95.