τὴν π. δύναμιν
—obj. of
δείσαντες, while
αὐτήν is obj. of
καταπλαγῆτε.
καταπλαγῆτε
—
i.e. that
fear may induce Camarina to join the A.
τοὺς . . λόγους
—depends on
δείσαντες. μέλλοντας is contrasted with
παροῦσαν, λόγους with
δύναμιν. ‘We sent out our cmbassy, not from a fear that . . but from a fear that the words that they intended to address to you before you could hear what we have to say, might persuade you.’ Notice that
πρίν τι . . ἀκοῦσαι precedes
μή, and consequently belongs to
τοὺς μέλλοντας, not to
πείσωσιν.
ᾗ πυνθάνεσθε
—sc.
ἥκειν: but
ἥν is direct obj. of
ὑπονοοῦμεν. (So Classen; Kruger and others explain
ᾗ as attracted for
ἥν, and
ἥν as left unattracted for the sake of variety, but this is scaicely probable.)
κατοικίσαι . . ἐξοικἰσαι
—paronomasia,
adnominatio; cf. c. 76, 4
ἀξυνετωτέρου, κακοξυνετωτέρου: 79, 2
ἀλόγως . . εὐλόγῳ. It is very common in Thuc. See c. 72, 4.
τὰς μὲν ἐκει = πόλεις
—Aegina, Scione, and Melos are especially referred to.
Χαλκιδέων
—see c. 3, 3. The Chalcidians of Euboea are said to be ‘enslaved’ because their independence is gone.
δουλεία often denotes the opposite of
αὐτονομία .
δουλωσαμένους ἔχειν
—cf. c. 39, 2 n. There is again an enthymeme here. See on c. 10, 5.
ἰδέᾳ
—‘method.’
ἐκεῖνα
—
i.e.
τὰ ἐκεῖ, their possessions in Greece.
ἔσχον
, ‘obtamed.’ With
πειρῶνται
supply
σχεῖν, the infin. or partic. being often omitted with verbs that require the completion:
e.g.
v. 80
οὐ μέντοι εὐθύς γε ἀπέστη ἀλλὰ διενοεῖτο (sc.
ἀποστῆναι)
ὅτι καὶ τοὺς Ἀργείους ἑώρα (sc.
ἀποστάντας).
ἡγεμόνες γάρ
—the likelihood that the view expressed is correct is shown by an example from previous events. This is the argument known as
τὸ εἰκός supported by
παραδείγματα. There is another instance in c. 79, 1.
ἑκόντων τῶν τε Ἰώνων
—cf.
I. 95
ἐν τῇδε τῇ ἡγεμονίᾳ ἤδη βιαίου ὄντος (sc. Pausanias) . .
οὐχ ἤκιστα οἱ Ἴωνες . . φοιτῶντες πρὸς τοὺς Ἀθηναίους ἠξίουν αὐτοὺς ἡγεμόνας σφῶν γενέσθαι. Herod.
VIII. 3
ἀπείλοντο τὴν ἡγεμονἰαν τοὺς Λακεδαιμονίους.
Ath. Pol. c. 23
ἐπὶ τὴν ἀπόστασιν τὴν τῶν Ἰώνων ἀπὸ τῆς τῶν Λακεδαιμονίων συμμαχίας Ἀριστείδης ἦν ὁ προτρέψας. This was in 478-477 B.C.
ἀπὸ σφῶν—τῶν Ἀθηναίων,
i.e.
ὅσοι ἄποικοι αὐτῶν ἦσαν (Schol.). Poppo quotes
I. 12
Ἴωνας Ἀθηναῖοι καὶ νησιωτῶν τοὺς πολλοὺς ᾤκισαν (Ionia and the Cyclades).
ὡς ἐπὶ τοῦ Μ. τιμωρίᾳ
—this was the primary object of the new confederacy.
τοὺς μέν
—depends on
κατεστρέψαντο.
λιποστρατίαν is obj. to
ἐπενεγκόντες. Plut.
Cim. c. 11 of the allies,
ἄνδρας καὶ ναῦς ὡς ἐτάχθησαν οὐ παρεῖχον .
ἐπ) ἀλλήλους στρατεύειν
—sc.
ἐπενεγκόντες: others were charged with making war on one another. This occurred in the case of Samos and Miletus (
I. 115
).
τοῖς δέ
—governed by
ἐπενεγκόντες, in accordance with custom where a common object of a partic. and verb is near the partic. Cf. c. 77, 2.
εἶχον
—sc.
ἐπενεγκεῖν. Cf.
I. 99
αἰτίαι ἄλλαι τε ἦσαν τῶν ἀποστάσεων καὶ μέγισται αἱ τῶν φόρων καὶ νεῶν ἔκδειαι .
κατεστρέψαντο
—cf.
Ath. Pol. c. 24
λαβόντες τὴν ἀρχὴν τοῖς συμμάχοις δεσποτικωτέρως ἐχρῶντο.
καὶ οὐ περὶ κτλ
— ‘so, it seems (
ἄρα ironical), Athens was not contending for the freedom of Greece nor Greece for her own when they resisted the Persians: Athens resisted them in order to substitute dependence on herself for dependence on them; Greece resisted to secure a change to a new master, who had not less sense, but made a worse use of his cleverness’;
i.e., as Freeman says, ‘the other Gks. had simply exchanged the Mede for a master of greater understand ing, but of understanding used only for mischief,’ as they found afterwaids.
οἱ δ’ ἐπί
—strictly this should be
οἱ δὲ δ. μεταβολῆς, still depending on
περὶ δέ.
δεσπότου μ
.—cf. c. 18, 7 n. The artificiality of this passage is censured by Dion. Hal.
ἔχοντες παραδείγματα
—the ‘examples’ are of two kinds: there aie (1) the experience of the subjects of Athens; (2) the repetition of the deception. Both of these demonstrate the folly of not combining. Hence
τῶν τε ἐκεῖ Ἑ. is answered by
καὶ . . σοφίσματα, in apposition to
παραδείγματα. Then
κατοικίσεις and
ἐπικουρίας are the explanation of
σοφίσματα— ‘tricks such as the restoration of L.,’ etc.
ξυστραφέντες
—‘combining’; cf. Demosth. 9, 60
συστραφἐντες ἄνθρωποι πολλοί.
οὐκ Ἴωνες τάδε
—‘here are no Iouians.’
τάδε ‘usitatum ubi dicere volunt:
haec quae hic vides circum te jacentia’ (Goller).
είσίν is constructed to suit the complement.
Ἴωνες . . Ἑλλησπόντιοι . . νησιῶται
—three of the districts into which the citics of the Athenian Empire were grouped. Cf.
I. 89
οἱ Ἀθηναῖοι καὶ οἱ ἀπὸ Ἰωνίας καὶ Ἑλλης πόντου ξύμμαχοι. For the
νησιῶται see c. 76, 3.
αἰεὶ μεταβάλλοντες
—‘with occasional changes.’ The middle is usual. So Thuc. has
μεταχειρίζειν for
μεταχειρίζεσθαι, πειρᾶν =
πειρᾶσθαι, προιέναι =
προίεσθαι.
δουλοῦνται
—‘are dependent upon.’
Δωριῆς
—they affected to despise the Ionians.
Σικελίαν
—Freeman points out that Sicily is here dealt with as
ἤπειρος (cf. on c. 1, 2), and is contrasted with
νησιῶται.
ἢ μένομεν
—‘what, are we waiting?’ So in colloquial Latin
quid ago? is more lively than
quid agam?
εἶδος
—the ‘method’ that is explained in what follows.
ἡμῶν
—depends on
τοὺς μέν.
ξυμμάχων ἐλπίδι
—‘hy the hope of obtaining allies’—
i.e. alliance with the Athenians is the temptation offered.
ἐκπολεμοῦν πρὸς ἀλλήλους
—cf. c. 91, 6
τὰ ἐνθάδε χρὴ . . ἐκπολεμοῦν ‘stir up to war.’
τοῖς δὲ κτλ
—this depends on
λέγοντες, being attracted to the dat. by
ἑκάστοις. Hence the sentence =
τοῖς δὲ ὡς ἑκάστοις . . λέγοντες δύνανται (
κακουργεῖν ),
κακουργεῖν (
αὐτούς), ‘and to injure others in any way they can while using smooth words suited to the case.’ Hermocrates detects three designs on the part of the A.: (1) to sow dissension by reviving the differences that had been suppressed in the treaty of Gela 424 B.C.; (2) to invite the cities to join Athens against the Dorian states; (3) most insidious of all, to speak fair and play foul. Two examples of the last had occurred already: (
a) the entrance into Catana, e. 51; (
b) the false message from Catana to Syracnse, c. 64. For
προσηνές
see Index s. v.
καὶοἰόμεθα κτλ
—‘and while our countryman at a distance is perishing do we imagine that the danger will not extend to every one of us?’ The distant countryman is Syracuse; the subject of
οἰόμεθα still the Siceliots at large (§ 1
ἡμᾶς αὐτούς).
προαπολλυμένου is
temporal, coincident in time with
οἰόμεθα.
οὐ καὶ ἐς αὐτόν τινα
—this is the inclusive use of
τις often found close to a plur., as in
VII. 39
ὅσα τις ἔχει, πάντας ἀναγκάσαι πωλεῖν. For
ἥκειν ἐς ‘penetrate to’ cf.
II. 48
καὶ ἐς τὴν ἄνω πόλιν ἀφίκετο (
ἡ νόσος), and for the opinion,
I. 120
κἂν μέχρι σφῶν τὸ δεινὸν προελθεῖν.
πρὸ δὲ αὐτοῦ κτλ
—this stands for
μᾶλλον δὲ τὸν πρὸ αὐτοῦ πάσχοντα καθ) αὑτὸν δ., ‘but rather that he who suffers before one confines the trouble to himself,’
i.e. isolates it, prevents it from spreading. For the order, which is due to the emphasis laid on
πρὸ αὐτοῦ, cf.
II. 7
ἐξ Ἰταλίας τοῖς ἑλομἐνοις for
τοῖς ἐξ Ἰ. ἑ.